Rimowa x Supreme Partnership
Former Managing Director at RIMOWA and Goyard
inpractise.com/articles/rimowa-supreme-lucury-partnership
Why is this interview interesting?
- How the partnership with Supreme turbocharged Rimowa’s growth whilst maintaining brand equity
Clement Brunet-Moret
Former Managing Director at RIMOWA and Goyard
Interview Transcript
Could we look at your time at RIMOWA now? Maybe you could just provide some context to when you joined RIMOWA and the state of the brand?
I joined RIMOWA right after it was purchased by LVMH, with the intention of making it a true luxury brand. RIMOWA, when I joined, was a beautiful and amazing product and a well-recognized product. Most of the hard work had already been done. That luggage, with the grooves, was very well-recognized in most markets, around the world, especially in Asia, thanks to the initial investment that had been done. But yet, the brand itself was not very well-known. Most of my immediate friends and family had no idea what RIMOWA was.
Clearly, we need to build the brand and build brand equity, beyond only, a simple luggage with grooves. That’s what the team went on and did. One of the key levers, I would say, that we used to do that, were the partnerships. As I mentioned earlier, I think the Supreme partnership with Louis Vuitton was a fantastic example, so we did it, as well, at RIMOWA. We did it in very selective locations. We did it in very selective quantities and it was a very powerful tool. It was an extremely powerful tool to change, in the eyes of potential business partners, such as shopping mall partners, but also in the eyes of the customers, obviously, the brand value, the brand image, literally, overnight.
It shows that it’s possible. But when you carefully craft the right story and the right impact for your brand, you can change overnight. But yet, what people don’t realize is, that RIMOWA was already a strong product. It didn’t come out of nowhere. It would not have worked in the same way, if the brand was totally new or the product was not a strong product. It only worked because the base was very strong. Supreme brought on the only thing that was missing to RIMOWA, which was branding. That strong brand name, they had it. They had no product; they only had a brand. We only had products, but no brand. So it was a perfect match.
It brought that desire for the brand, that craving. People were crazy about finding the luggage. They went online. Some sold for close to $8,000 on eBay, so crazy amounts of money, for luggage. That worked well, for RIMOWA. That’s what we did. In parallel, obviously, the groundwork was about aligning the distribution network with the new strategy of the brand. Therefore, we internalized a lot of the distribution. As it has been said in the press, so I can talk about it, but the brand decided to go and work directly in some markets, in order to control distribution, relocate the stores, invest in capex with the new image that the brand has, which are fantastic LVM and stock concepts. Very modern and the opposite of what it was before, because LVMH had the financial means and capacity to heavily invest in the brand, to turn around, which was done very successfully, by the way.
A unique story. I always say unique, because every story is unique. We took RIMOWA with, again, a relatively weak branding, but a strong product base. It is not often the case. If you look at old brand, they tend to have a strong brand and a weak product offer. RIMOWA was the opposite of that.
What do you look for, in a partner, if you were partnering with a brand?
Do you mean a distribution partner?
Copyright Notice
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities.
© 2024 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.