This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
Some would call it a monopoly, but it's a product that is consistently 90% of the market. No one can scratch it; it's a great model. But it also slows down decision-making. When you think about ChatGPT and all that stuff where it gets really interesting, and it's a hot topic, this is potentially where this culture of everything needing to be crossed and checked 25 times can slow things down a bit, and by the time you react, the market is prepared. We can talk about that specifically as a risk. I'm not saying this is a risk, but I'm saying the culture can backfire quickly, and the reality is that Google has been playing defensive on that in the Search business for years, and they are able to sustain their position. I don't think Google is thinking about it through an offensive lens. Google thinks we already control the market; we just need to continue incrementally being the best we can be.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
To your words about Google, a user can be lukewarm, but I don't think Bing has created anything innovative over the last few years. The reality is that Bing, at best or in most cases, can provide a similar, if not identical, experience to Google. Google is already so integrated into the system. A key point that we need to mention is the platforms that Google has to drive you to search. The friction for me, as a user, to take my iPhone and instead of tapping directly and going into Google Search – Google pays $20 billion to Apple for that, by the way – I go to Bing or download an app. All that stuff is too much friction for a very low marginal value.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2024 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.
Subscribe to access hundreds of interviews and primary research