Glovo & EU Convenience Delivery
Former Corporate Strategy at Glovo
inpractise.com/articles/glovo-and-eu-convenience-delivery
Why is this interview interesting?
- Glovo founding story and category expansion strategy
- Impact on order frequency and customer retention when adding new categories
- Impact of Spanish labour laws on restaurant delivery economics
- Dark store vs marketplace convenience model
- Average basket and order value in convenience delivery
- How convenience delivery can change food delivery landscape
Glovo & EU Convenience Delivery (May 14, 2021)
Paul-Louis Lepine
Former Corporate Strategy at Glovo
Interview Transcript
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
Related Content
Just Eat Takeaway: UK vs EU Courier Models and Delivery Economics
Former Director at Just Eat Takeaway
Just Eat Takeaway vs Wolt Germany & Employed Courier Models
Former Senior Executive at Wolt
Deliveroo, Nando's Exclusivity, and UK Food Delivery
Former Director at Deliveroo PLC
Online Food Delivery: Spain Labor Law & Market Structure Changes
Former Head of Enterprise Sales, EMEA, Uber Eats
Copyright Notice
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2025 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.