Daily Journal vs Tyler Technologies: A Customer's Perspective
Former Executive at the National Center for State Courts
inpractise.com/articles/daily-journal-vs-tyler-technologies-a-customers-perspective
Daily Journal vs Tyler Technologies: A Customer's Perspective(November 22, 2024)
Former Executive at the National Center for State Courts
Interview Transcript
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
What's so great about them in terms of technical aspects, service, or cost?
Their costs are more reasonable than Tyler's, and they have a great support team. Their implementation and post-implementation support are excellent. They're very responsive, unlike Tyler and other vendors who often delay and insist their product is better. Their platform is well-developed, and they're always looking to improve it. I'm very satisfied with their development cycles.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
If you look into the next 10 years, considering this is a slowly moving industry, do you think market share might gradually shift away from Tyler? People might realize the service isn't as good as expected. Would that have an impact, or not really? I'm curious about how you think market shifts could evolve over the long term.
My strategy is cloud first, but probably only a third of the CIOs around the country share my viewpoint, and you have a number who are just comfortable with where they're currently at. I do think that ultimately cloud will take over, it's just a lot slower.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
Related Content
Daily Journal: US Market Fragmentation, Court Component Model & AI Impact
Former State Judicial Educator at the Michigan Supreme Court
Daily Journal: US Judiciary & Court Software Market Dynamics
Director of Business Development at CourtView Justice Solutions
Daily Journal vs Tyler Technologies: US Judiciary & Court Software
Former Senior Project Manager at Tyler Technologies
TSLA, Brown & Brown, Rolex & Watches of Switzerland, DJCO, Belron, VEEV, bioMérieux, Dynatrace, TechTarget
Copyright Notice
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2024 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.