Daily Journal vs Tyler Technologies: US Judiciary & Court Software
Former Senior Project Manager at Tyler Technologies
inpractise.com/articles/daily-journal-tyler-technologies-us-judiciary-and-court-software-market-dynamics
Daily Journal vs Tyler Technologies: US Judiciary & Court Software(June 21, 2024)
Former Senior Project Manager at Tyler Technologies
Interview Transcript
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
I don't know if you know the answer to this, but why don't all courts use one standardized software? Why does every county and court seem to have their own solution?
Welcome to the world of courts. You might look at the criminal justice system, civil justice system, etc., and think, "You all do the same thing. You should be able to use the same system." However, you'll find that legislation in different areas tends to vary all the way down to the county, and in some cases, down to the city level. If you're dealing with city ordinances, they're different, their rulings are different. The methods they use to evaluate their cases are different. How they accept filings, the deadlines, timelines on those, and how they go about scheduling cases, they all tend to be different.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
Related Content
Daily Journal: US Judiciary & Court Software Market Dynamics
Director of Business Development at CourtView Justice Solutions
Daily Journal vs Tyler Technologies: A Customer's Perspective
Former Executive at the National Center for State Courts
Daily Journal: US Market Fragmentation, Court Component Model & AI Impact
Former State Judicial Educator at the Michigan Supreme Court
Danaher Cytiva & Pall Bundling, First Watch, Vitrolife, Ecolab, L&W, DJCO, Builders FirstSource, Alta Equipment, FTAI, Macfarlane
Copyright Notice
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2024 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.