Perimeter Solutions: PHOS-CHEK & US Wildfire Retardants
Former Global Director at Perimeter Solutions
inpractise.com/articles/perimeter-solutions-phos-chek-and-us-wildfire-retardants
Perimeter Solutions: PHOS-CHEK & US Wildfire Retardants(July 31, 2024)
Former Global Director at Perimeter Solutions
Interview Transcript
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
For both air and ground?
Yes, for 60 years, it has been proven as the best retardant to render vegetation nonflammable. At least 10 different chemicals have been tested for cost efficacy and environmental impact. The main criticism against Perimeter is that it kills fish. If you dump a large amount of ammonium into an active body of water with fish, it will kill them. But why would you dump a large amount of fire retardant into an active body of water? That would be a mistake. People focus on the one in a thousand cases where the pilot makes a mistake, pushes the button too early, gets nervous, or gets scared in the smoke and drops a bunch of it in water. Intelligent environmentalists say, okay, it will happen once in a while. There will be some dead fish occasionally, but there won't be dead people or burned communities. This is the best retardant, and it's effective.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
Related Content
FortressFire vs Perimeter Solutions: Qualified Wildfire Retardants
Former Strategy and Finance at FortressFire
Perimeter Solutions: Product Litigation & New Entrants
Perimeter Solutions vs Fortress: Aerial Fire Retardant Competition
Perimeter Solutions: Fighting Wildfires, PHOS-CHEK & Alternative Products
Former Director at SEI Industries & Wildfire Officer, British Columbia
Copyright Notice
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2024 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.