FortressFire vs Perimeter Solutions: Qualified Wildfire Retardants
Former Strategy and Finance at FortressFire
inpractise.com/articles/fortressfire-vs-perimeter-solutions-qualified-wildfire-retardants
FortressFire vs Perimeter Solutions: Qualified Wildfire Retardants(September 1, 2024)
Former Strategy and Finance at FortressFire
Interview Transcript
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
So just back to this approval process. How long does the testing take? Roughly a year for the fish toxicity and corrosion?
I think, yes, about a year for QPL testing, just to get into the OFE. I would start that clock from when the business was formed in May 2019 or maybe March 2019. We really began the QPL process late that year. So, end of 2019, you could say we began. 2020 was all QPL testing. Summer of 2021 was the first time we were into an OFE. The earliest you'd be able to contract would be fire season 2022. But just to get the results from the OFE and make sure everything is good to go kind of kicks you into fire season 2023, which is when we got our first contract. So we actually nailed the timeline. We got through and into contracting probably as fast as you could, with the exception of maybe if everything went perfectly, we could have been in a season sooner.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
Related Content
Perimeter Solutions: PHOS-CHEK & US Wildfire Retardants
Former Global Director at Perimeter Solutions
Perimeter Solutions vs Fortress: Aerial Fire Retardant Competition
Perimeter Solutions: Fighting Wildfires, PHOS-CHEK & Alternative Products
Former Director at SEI Industries & Wildfire Officer, British Columbia
TransDigm: SEI Industries & Wildfire Products
Former Director at SEI Industries & Wildfire Officer, British Columbia
Copyright Notice
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2024 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.