Perimeter Solutions’ fire safety business includes two different products: retardants and suppressants. Each product has a different chemical formulation and use case. Retardants are ammonium phosphate and dropped from aircraft ahead of a fire to stop it spreading; suppressants are foams that help firefighters extinguish fires caused by flammable and combustible liquids. Different products, different use cases, and often different customers.
One similarity between the two product types is that each has ongoing litigation that may impact Perimeter’s long-term earning power. Foams are under pressure from multi-district AFFF litigation in which major defendants 3M and Tyco recently paid out billions whereas the litigation against aerial retardants is more nuanced.
This research provides an overview of product litigation risks and potential new entrants against PRMs aerial retardant cash cow.
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities.
© 2024 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.
Subscribe to access hundreds of interviews and primary research