Partner Interview
Published May 27, 2024
Medpace, IQVIA, & Benefits of Scale in Biotech CRO
inpractise.com/articles/medpace-large-vs-small-biotech-cros
Executive Bio
Former Clinical Operations Executive at Merck
Interview Transcript
Disclaimer: This interview is for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as a basis for investment decisions. In Practise is an independent publisher and all opinions expressed by guests are solely their own opinions and do not reflect the opinion of In Practise.
This is a snippet of the transcript.to get full access.
After working with Medpace as a customer at ONO and being involved in bid defenses at larger pharmaceutical companies, could you discuss the differences in what a bid defense looks like for a large CRO and large pharma versus the small biotech side? Is it more or less competitive, does it take longer, or are there other differences?
Yes, the sales cycle is very long. Large pharma outsourcing is more transactional and hands-off. The procurement process at these larger pharma-sponsored companies is highly sophisticated, and the outsourcing is very hands-off. There are certain long-standing partnerships with preferred providers. Large pharma companies have an authorized vendor list, and if you're on that list, you are one of the two or three invited to bid on new work. Once it's awarded, it becomes very transactional, almost like a 'set it and forget it' scenario. They trust their partners to adhere to the partnership governance rules. They typically have a larger portfolio of outsourced work with each partner, and governance occurs at a higher level across the portfolio. Reviews are more like a dashboard overview, indicating which studies are green, yellow, or red and need more attention.
This is a snippet of the transcript.to get full access.
After working with Medpace as a customer at ONO and being involved in bid defenses at larger pharmaceutical companies, could you discuss the differences in what a bid defense looks like for a large CRO and large pharma versus the small biotech side? Is it more or less competitive, does it take longer, or are there other differences?
This is very different from outsourcing with smaller biotech companies, where a project may be their only one. For them, it's less transactional and more of a consultative, iterative process. They heavily rely on the expertise of their CRO partner for early guidance in the development of their molecule or product. The relationship is much more important, less transactional, and more interactive from an earlier stage. They don't have the volume or often only have operational SOPs, so they depend on the CRO partner's quality management system. That's the long answer to your short question, but that's the biggest difference between large pharma and biopharma outsourcing versus smaller biotech outsourcing.
Free Sample of 50+ Interviews
Sign up to test our content quality with a free sample of 50+ interviews.
Or contact sales for full access
Related Content

Medpace: CRO Customer Interactions
Former Clinical Trial Executive at Medpace

Porvair & Chromatography Lab Equipment: M&A Process & Culture
Former Senior Vice President Life Sciences at J.G. Finneran, Porvair plc

Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc: Culture and Management
Former Director at Thermo Fisher Scientific

Thermo Fisher vs Danaher: Business Model and Competitive Positioning
Former Director, Corporate Strategy & Business Development at Thermo Fisher Scientific
© 2024 In Practise. All rights reserved. This material is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as investment advice.