This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
This is somewhat of a philosophical question. Generally, many companies tend to outsource the earlier phases more than the later phases. In the later phases, pharmaceutical companies often prefer to control manufacturing internally. The early clinical phases are outsourced to quickly determine if the molecules are promising in the clinic. The early phase is also more volatile, which highlights the issue of in-house capacity and utilization volatility.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
If you're always at 100% utilization, that's ideal. However, the CDMO world exists because sometimes utilization is very low due to a lack of projects, leading to idle costs. Conversely, you might have 120% or 150% utilization, causing delays and loss of valuable patent time as molecules queue in your facility, preventing you from being on the fastest track. This is the dilemma, and it's why large companies outsource.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
First of all, I think it depends very much on the volume of the drug. For instance, there are very low-volume drugs, like normal vaccines—not pandemic vaccines—where a few bioreactors can provide millions of doses. Or, if you have orphan drugs with about 2,000 patients a year, you need less drug. For other highly efficient drugs like T-cell engagers, the drug amount is reduced, and typically you go with outsourcing and stockpiling as a large pharma company.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2025 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.