Fortnite Gameplay Design & Monetization

Former Head of UI, Epic Games

Why is this interview interesting?

  • Core differences in Heroes of the Storm and Fornite gameplay design and mechanics
  • How hero characters can shape the gameplay and monetization
  • Why Battle Royale is the perfect game mode
  • The design of the Battlepass, loot boxes, and player retention strategies
  • Fortnite player behavior versus other FTP games
  • What defines success in a 'third space' or virtual world like Fortnite
  • How to look at the power of Fortnite's 'blank canvas' intellectual property

Executive Bio

Matt Schembari

Former Head of UI, Epic Games

Matt has over 20 years of experience developing free-to-play games. He is the Former Head of UI at Epic Games, where he led a cross-disciplinary team of designers, artists and programmers for five years to build Fortnite. Matt worked closely with product owners to craft the gameplay and in-game services across all Fortnite modes. Prior to Epic, Matt spent 8 years at Blizzard working on StarCraft Heart of the Swarm and then Heroes of the Storm. Matt now runs a studio building a new free-to-play game.Read more

View Profile Page

Interview Transcript

When you entered the StarCraft team, what exactly was your role?

My position was as a staff level programmer on the editor team. Anyone who has played StarCraft, may have seen the custom games and the editor that goes out with StarCraft; Blizzard has a long history of modding. I was working on the editor team, as a programmer and I started, initially, doing art tools. I was doing things such as the previewer, which was the tool that the artists used to look at their models and animations and things like that. Then I worked on some lighting tools. Eventually, I transitioned to this cut-scene editor, which was a large project that I spent three or four years on, in total.

In Heart of the Swarm, we wanted to really up the level of quality for the cinematics. In particularly, the cut scenes that happened between missions. Not the fully rendered ones that are the start and the end of the game, but all the ones in between, where the characters are talking to each other; briefing and debriefing after missions, and stuff like that. I worked with some of the other artists and tech designers and we built this brand-new cut-scene system, which was really cool and really exciting to work on. It was the tool set and the engine port and so on. That was my initial period of time at Blizzard, that tools period. Then I transitioned to UI after that.

Can we talk about how you thought about recreating the story and using the StarCraft characters to develop Heroes of the Storm?

Heroes of the Storm, of course, is a game that is all about the Blizzard IP. In many ways, it was a game that was for the fans and, for us, as fans ourselves, it was a matter of finding a way to make some sense of all these IPs smashing together. I do need to say that I wasn’t part of the story development, myself, for the role that I played; but I was adjacent to it. Really, I think it came down to the artists wanting to explore some new ideas, some new worlds, some ways that these characters could come together. The whole idea of the Nexus being this world between worlds and the idea that Sanctuary is a planet somewhere and Korhal, in StarCraft, and all these worlds are just out there, floating in this universe, that they can possibly come together.

I think, officially, it’s all considered non-cannon, but it was still a fun exploration. For the part of the team that I was on, on the UI side, a lot of the inspiration we were drawing from was things like eighties cartoons and eighties metal and hyper, over-exaggerated lightning bolts and craziness and bright pinks and blues. Bringing all these things together, in a really fun and irreverent way. Trying not to take itself too seriously and just really being a fun and colorful and wild game.

Do you think it’s easier when you have characters and a narrative, like StarCraft, and what that made of Heroes of the Storm, to create more of an engaging gameplay, versus the likes of Fortnite, which is more of a user-generated game, in a way?

It’s interesting; I think they can be really different. The three games that you just mentioned are all on very different wavelengths, for how they approach stories. StarCraft is a narrative game, in terms of a single player, as obviously, there is the multi-player, as well. The single-player game isn’t narrative; a story was told, starring Raynor and Kerrigan and all that. The Heroes of the Storm was bringing together known characters, known IPs and messing with them a bit, but they were still known characters. You were playing as Kerrigan and when she kills Raynor, she has something to say about it; if she kills Diablo, there’s some interesting things there. That’s the Marvel mashup kind of thing. Fortnite is very much a blank slate, that the players can put their own stories, in a similar way that Minecraft or Roblox might, as well. It’s really all about the UGC and all the events that happen all the time. There is a rough narrative that’s happening, with Fortnite, season over season. A lot of it is really about the players and what they bring to the table and what they’re doing with their friends; they’re hanging out and they’re doing fun things. The story, for them, is really just a backdrop.

I don’t know that I could say that any of them are more or more less engaging; they are just very different styles of story.

How did you look at the defining features of the gameplay of Heroes?

We were entering an established genre of MOBA. One of the things that we looked at, quite a bit on Heroes, was how can we improve the genre. That’s something that I think Blizzard is excellent at and it has always been. They will take a genre, like MMOs or RTS play and say, how can we add charm, make it more approachable, make it more accessible, make it more mainstream? Of course, the MOBA genre, at the time that Heroes was being developed, was very established; League of Legends was out there; Dota 2 was out there. So a lot of it was really about looking at what those games did, what they did well and what they didn’t do well. And trying to figure out how we could make it more approachable, more accessible.

As an example, the shared XP was something that we explored and that was something that was intended to make the game easier for players who, maybe, aren’t as familiar with the genre or where they are trying to be really fiddly with getting last hits and things like that. It also helped the game break out of its restrictions, in that you could have more interesting or unique characters that are doing different roles. For example, Lost Vikings can be in multiple lanes or Murky doesn’t really need to be in a lane much or Abathur can just hang out back in the base. It was the idea that XP had a different set of rules and it was, basically, more forgiving in a lot of ways. It allowed for more wild characters to be developed, where you’re not worried about the economy of the game – how much XP you’re getting and how much gold you’re getting – being dependent on your presence in the lane.

Sign up to read the full interview and hundreds more.


Fortnite Gameplay Design & Monetization(June 30, 2020)

Sign up to listen to the full interview and hundreds more.


Company Channels


Speak to Executive

Join waiting list for IP Partner
Did you like this article ?