This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
The problem is they (Credit Acceptance) use different book values than we do. So, when we're sending deals across, the book values don't match up. They're using different standards to qualify their customers. I believe that's where the biggest problem with CACC lies.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
Essentially, CACC gives us a six-month period. If the customer refinances within six months, we get a chargeback. If they keep it past the six months, we don't get that chargeback. Most banks have a 90-day no-chargeback period. CACC is the longest, extending up to six months or 180 days. If there's a way to reduce that chargeback timeframe, I think you would see a lot more deals.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
Another main reason we don't use them is the qualification process it uses. When we input the customer's information into Dealertrack, it pushes to CACC. We open up the CACC portal, which is CAPS, and we conduct our deal through there. If there was a way where it could provide us with multiple vehicles to choose from instead of the one it thinks is the best, that would be better.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2024 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.
Subscribe to access hundreds of interviews and primary research