This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
Taiwan is attractive because, unlike other countries, it doesn't have Amazon. The local competitor PChome was recently acquired by a local competitor. Momo is a tough competitor but doesn't seem eager to expand. Shopee is a behemoth but has a lot of baggage, mainly being a 3P marketplace with a chaotic customer experience. I believe Bom and the team see a long-term opportunity to bring a better ecommerce experience to Taiwan. There's no competitor well-positioned to capture the Taiwanese market, which requires steady returns. Momo isn't going to spend a lot to expand rapidly. Shopee is willing but has reputation and supply chain issues, including fraudulent activities.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
Looking at Taiwan's macro environment, public government stats suggest that roughly 10% or 11% of retail spending is online. Compared to other developed markets, that's low. Other countries might have 20%, South Korea 30%, and China and the US around 20% to 25%. There's plenty of market opportunity.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
I think the two responses to focus on are Momo and Shopee. Momo rolled out a membership program because we offer more attractive pricing. Their program focuses on discounting, which I don't necessarily think is the right long-term incentive, though it provides an immediate response. Momo did not specifically change their pricing but restructured their 3P marketplace. It's yet to be seen how effective that will be.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2025 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.