In Practise reflects on some of the key lessons and major questions explored in one or more interviews each week
Although we are all interested in margin, it must never be done at the expense of our philosophy. Increasing the retail prices and justifying it on the basis that we are still “competitive” could lead to a rude awakening as it has with so many. Let us concentrate on how cheap we can bring things to the people, rather than how much the traffic will bear, and when the race is over Fed-Mart will be there - Sol Price, Founder of Fed-Mart, Price Club (merged with Costco), 1967
Sol Price’s quote perfectly describes Costco’s philosophy: to provide high-quality products at the lowest possible prices. Every little detail of Costco’s business leads to reducing prices to add more value to customers. Sol Price realised early on that the durability of a franchise is based on the persistence of value added to customers. The lower the prices, the more value Costco is giving back to customers. But, more importantly, the lower the prices, the harder it is to compete with Costco.
We have made a decision to continuously and significantly lower prices for customers year after year as our efficiency and scale make it possible. Our judgment is that relentlessly returning efficiency improvements and scale economies to customers in the form of lower prices creates a virtuous cycle that leads over the long-term to a much larger dollar amount of free cash flow, and thereby to a much more valuable Amazon.com. - Jeff Bezos, Amazon, 2005 Annual Letter
It’s remarkable how similar the quotes from Price and Bezos really are. Continually reducing prices drives higher sales volume over a fixed asset base. The incremental cost savings are passed back to customers which again fuels higher sales volumes and so goes the ‘virtuous cycle’. This strategy has created a unique level of trust and customer retention for Costco and Amazon. This also partly explains why both companies have near-zero marketing budgets. Everything is reinvested in price. The alternative is the easy option for retailers: increase the retail price or slotting fees to increase gross margin. This destroys trust and, as Sol suggested, ‘could lead to a rude awakening’.
Amazon and Costco approached the ‘everyday low price’ strategy from opposite angles: Amazon maximised selection and Costco minimised selection. Bezos extended the range to any willing third-party seller and created an online auction-like framework where suppliers competed in the ‘buy box’ to offer the lowest prices to customers. On the other hand, Costco limited selection to 4,000 SKU’s and is often the largest buyer of any individual SKU from suppliers. By limiting the SKU count, Costco created its own type of auction where suppliers compete to provide products at the cheapest price to millions of Costco members.
We interviewed a Costco buyer of 20 years to understand how Costco procures products and negotiates with suppliers. One principle that shines through when speaking to Costco executives is how Sinegal created a culture where reducing price to drive sales volume is the sole focus. There are also side-effects of this strategy that give Costco an advantage. For example, limiting the selection to 4,000 SKU’s changes the structure of the buying team:
Buying less SKUs means you can dedicate more time to the details. A typical supermarket buyer manages 1,000 to 2,000 SKUs, whereas Costco buyers manage less than 200. Their buying team is also much smaller because they do not need 10 buyers for each category. Having one who buys 50 SKUs is more efficient. The typical philosophy of Costco is managed mainly on sales which is king. Other retailers put profitability first, then sales, whereas Costco does the opposite.
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities.
© 2023 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.
Subscribe to access hundreds of interviews and primary research