CCC Intelligent Solutions vs Mitchell: Estimate Data Quality
Former Senior Director at CCC Intelligent Solutions
inpractise.com/articles/ccc-intelligent-solutions-vs-mitchell-estimate-data-quality
CCC Intelligent Solutions vs Mitchell: Estimate Data Quality(January 1, 2025)
Former Senior Director at CCC Intelligent Solutions
Interview Transcript
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
How would you compare the advantage or differentiation of CCC's total loss product versus Mitchell or Audatex?
From a total loss valuation perspective, the key is in conditioning and understanding how different packages add to the car's value. However, there's not a significant difference between them.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
Related Content
CCC Intelligent Solutions: Culture & Net Dollar Retention Opportunity
Former Vice President at CCC Information Services
CCC Intelligent Solutions: Appraisal Workflow & CCC One Sales Process
Former Director at CCC Intelligent Solutions
CCC: Tractable AI and Straight-Through-Processing
Former Director at Tractable
CCC vs Mitchell: Collision Repair Estimation Software
Former General Manager at Service King Collision
Copyright Notice
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2025 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.