This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
AWS pricing is influenced by economies of scale. Land, power, and other factors contribute to costs. Larger regions generally have lower costs due to economies of scale, and AWS passes these cost reductions to customers as regions grow. When customers want to move to the cloud, they decide where to place their region. Latency is a factor, but price is usually the main consideration since latency differences, like between Ohio and Virginia, are minimal—maybe one or two milliseconds.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
In the overall scheme of things, it's nothing. That's why in the news you see that AWS, Microsoft, and others are giving up on land or reselling land they committed to earlier. They're trying to make the case that it's because demand is decreasing, but that's not true. It's just that land is so cheap in the overall scheme of things. In many cases, you can land bank or make commitments to land earlier. In the AI space, it's really a race between those companies, including xAI and others. They're making commitments before doing full due diligence of the site. When you buy land, you drill holes for an environmental assessment and do a test to see how big of a data center can fit there, how to get power, and water. All that takes six months before buying the land. Now, because the market is undersupplied, they're making commitments before full diligence and sometimes drop them if it doesn't make financial sense.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
Yes, probably something close to that. It didn't drastically change. What changed is how fast it's consuming the power for that site and how fast that site needs to grow. The approach of cloud providers has changed drastically with AI. Before, they tried to avoid investing in new regions because of the three things mentioned. They tried to grow and get economies of scale in regions they were already invested in. But now, AI requires so much power, and the demand is so big that there isn't enough power in the regions where they have data centers today. They need to diversify and start building in Minnesota, Iowa, Philadelphia—places that wouldn't have made sense before, but they are doing that now because that's where there's power.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2025 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.