This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
They had multiple product categories. Traditionally, there were dresses, tops, and going-out dresses. However, they started to blur these categories. So, you would have day dresses, going-out dresses, and casual dresses. Each product had different garment techs and sizes were not standardized. This lack of standardization spiraled out of control. Because they were successful, everything they sold was selling, at least for a while. It didn't matter that returns crept up to 70%. This didn't happen overnight. People often say 40% is an average return rate, but I'd argue it's closer to 50%. Half of what you sell comes back because people are buying multiple sizes. There were many issues with fit. They also started to reduce prices too much, resorting to inferior fabrics. We use viscose elastane which should be about 220, but they were accepting garments at 180 to meet their price point. This is what we call engineering into price.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
Over the past few years, the heads have become more powerful, reducing the control of the buyers. A new lady, Elena, has come in. Initially, I wasn't sure about her, but she's proven to be very competent. If given the responsibility and authority, I believe she can make a difference. I think ASOS did well under Nick, who was a genuine leader and very inspiring. He's now a sought-after consultant. I don't think José has the same reach or authority as Nick, although I've heard he's a good guy with impressive credentials from Inditex. However, the leap from Inditex to ASOS must have been huge, especially during difficult times.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2024 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.