This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
I think, first and foremost, Adyen are mainly focused on large enterprise customers, so typically merchants who have multiple entities across the world and they want to optimize their authorization rates but also their payment costs. By having a global network of licenses and local acquiring capabilities, it allows their enterprise customers to process domestically in some markets, so maybe a Netflix could process with Adyen in Mexico domestically, which increases the authorization rate. In many countries, the issuing banks issue cards that are typically not set up for international or cross border payments.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
I would say Checkout is commonly known as more aggressive because they want to grow volume. They are still a bit smaller but they were very aggressive in winning large deals and sometimes at zero margin or even negative margin. Finally, in payments, it's about winning a customer and then growing it over the lifetime value over contract, so typically Checkout was well known for being aggressive. I've been competing with them during my Stripe time in some deals but where it was maybe a walkway moment for Stripe, Checkout.com dropped their pants and was able to contract that very aggressively. That’s common behavior when there's a contender in the market who really wants to win the market share.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2024 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.
Subscribe to access hundreds of interviews and primary research