Philippe has spent over 25 years developing end-to-end logistics systems from vendors to customers, including 18 years at Amazon.com. He joined Amazon in France in 2000 as Distribution Centre General Manager, moving to Amazon.co.uk (Scotland) in 2004, to support business growth within the UK. Philippe then took up several senior leadership positions in European Operations at Amazon EU Headquarters in Luxembourg, culminating in the role of VP Amazon Logistics Europe from 2015-18. Before joining Amazon, Philippe worked for Danzas (now DHL) in France. Throughout his career he has worked on network modelling, procurement and buying processes, inventory management, fulfillment management, and transportation network management. Since March 2018 Philippe has run his own consultancy business, holds several board positions and teaches Supply Chain Management and Global Logistics Strategy at university. Read moreView Profile Page
Firstly, it depends if you talking about fulfilment cost or the total cost, including picking up at the vendor and delivering to the customer. The in-the-box cost, from the door of the fulfilment to the outbound door of fulfilment, roughly 30% is spent in inbound and 70% in the outbound, of the total cost of process. It depends; it could be 25%:75%. Two thirds of the outbound is going to be the packing and shipping activity and one third is going to be the picking, roughly.
Again, that really depends on which type of building. It will vary a lot, depending on if there is a Kiva system, where there is a little bit less time spent in picking. There is a merge between picking and storing, because the same people are doing both, so that’s blurred a little bit. But roughly, I think, it would be that split, so 50% is in the packing and shipping.
I don’t know. The picking is where scale matters the most, or the density. We mentioned the density in delivery and the density in picking is one of the keys. Whether you are in automated or not, it’s still an optimization, because if you are in manual, that matters a lot, because that is the time that the picker has got to spend in walking, from location to location. But even when you are automated, it matters. The less movement that the robots are doing, the more movement they can do and the less distance they cover, the more available they are for the next pick. Therefore, if you can bring your shelf to a picker and have 15 items to pick at the same time, on the shelf, it’s better than having a shelf and pick one and having to then bring another one. The productivity will be better. Picking is maybe where the density matters most. Not the size because, of course, the bigger you are, the more challenging are your pick paths. But if you have a lot of volume, that’s where it matters.
For the rest, a little bit less, because the storing is random and so people are storing in the same area. When they go, they store and, as they don’t have any rules, they just store in the same area and they don’t move much. For the packing, in that case, no. It is not the case that if you have 10 packing tables it will go faster than one packing table on its own. For the whole organization, yes. With the conveyor, automatically loading trucks, those kind investments which could ultimately help in lowering your costs.