This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
For instance, they haven't been very public about the number of ad-supported subscribers they have for Disney+ and how frequently these subscribers are using the platform. The cost difference between ad-free and ad-supported is not significant on Disney+, so it's unclear how many people are actually using the product. Therefore, they haven't felt the need to use programmatic to drive fill and rate.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
I would venture to bet that Netflix will be more successful than Disney in terms of attracting ad-supported subscribers over time because of the depth of their content and the fact that they're making it harder for consumers to buy the ad-free experience. In the US, Netflix's base plan for a commercial-free experience is now $18.99, but it's $6.99 for ad-supported for all the same content. That's a $12 difference that I think the average American consumer will have to think about.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
Hulu and Roku, to a lesser extent, were the two driving forces behind why CTV programmatic is about price and not about fill. Unlike the display market, which became all about fill and lower price, we took a firm stance that we deserved a premium. This was one of the reasons why it was so successful.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2024 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.