This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
There's lots and lots of early entrants into this market space who want rapid enablement, ease of implementation, low friction, low code and generally, high regulation, controlling environments, which Ping Identity certainly provides a pretty good option. Things like SailPoint IdentityIQ, that's one where I've had some experience of using it; I think it's good as a general identity management solution, thinking about organizations which have a strong SailPoint implementation. A lot of heavy ERP implementation, resource management implementation, as organizations tread grounds and move more away from on-prem implementation – certainly my experience tells me if I look at the last two years and businesses I work for – very, very hungry in M&A activity.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
Do I sense that there's many of the differentiation between Okta versus Microsoft and the Azure products? I think there is still differentiation and I think differentiation isn't at a product and feature and capability level; there's very little in it that differentiates the core products in terms of the identity, the management, the federation, the SSO, the MFA, the security. If you look at the core tenants on the tools, there's very little in it. I think the differentiation still goes back to the point I was saying to your question around what's in the bag for Okta here? Are they going to be able to play the long game? Because Okta still is recognized as an IDM, SSO management framework, product capability, and all of the above, I think that sees them almost as an entity that plays in that space and leads that space. That's also because that's what industry says, that's what the research or the analysts say. That still remains the case. The differentiator still is brand, robust presence and reference ability.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2024 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.
Subscribe to access hundreds of interviews and primary research