This is a snippet of the transcript.Contact Salesto get full access.
They are. Distribution plays a significant role. Companies like Nitori and MUJI have offline stores where they are competitive, and their online presence is a traditional ecommerce experience, not optimized for digital marketing. It's difficult for them to compete with smaller players who optimize their products for marketplaces, complying with Amazon FBA rules and adapting to Sagawa and Yamato's requirements, which dominate last-mile delivery.
This is a snippet of the transcript.Contact Salesto get full access.
Nitori, IKEA, and MUJI still optimize for their major offline channels, making it difficult to compete online. As distribution and consumption move online, it becomes trickier. Three or four years ago, I would have said they were winning because ecommerce was slow, but now, in some categories, 50% of consumption is happening online. It raises the question of how long they can remain competitive.
This is a snippet of the transcript.Contact Salesto get full access.
Nitori was one of the first in Japan to offer free delivery after a certain threshold. That was a project I tried to implement at IKEA, but it took me multiple years due to the lack of flexibility. Nitori was offering free delivery for orders over ¥7,000 or ¥8,000, which is about £75. IKEA couldn't do that because it would have required paying a lot of money to external companies like Sagawa and Yamato, which management wouldn't agree to. Nitori was ahead of the game in this regard. For IKEA, delivery was the number one concern for purchasing online and offline, whereas for Nitori, it was a strength. This is one of the primary reasons why Nitori has been outperforming IKEA over the last five or six years.
This is a snippet of the transcript.Contact Salesto get full access.
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2025 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.
Subscribe to access hundreds of interviews and primary research