This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
There's really only one other market I can think of with similar exclusions or limitations, but the majority don't. I think it depends on what their vision of their business model is. Some insurance companies I work with are on the other end of the spectrum. We call them true partners. They want to provide the protection businesses need and have the resources to analyze data and understand risks. They have excellent claims experts on staff and want to write similar accounts, but they are methodical in their review. They are less willing to negotiate the price, stating that they are willing to do it, but it must be with a specific deductible or premium to work for them. We have to be more selective when engaging a market like that, which is willing to partner with a business and provide what they need, but the business must be willing to pay for it.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
I think there's opportunity on both ends of the spectrum. From my perspective, focusing more on the balance sheet and providing minimal coverage that meets certain requirements gives business owners some coverage. I haven't had any in-depth conversations about this, except when I met with some Kinsale executives a few months ago in San Diego at the National Conference for Surplus Lines and Wholesale. When I asked them about the usage of certain forms and their position, they stated these are concerns they have in general, and they want to use these forms to protect the business.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
I believe their technological capabilities allow them to operate in a more churn-and-burn manner. The time each underwriter spends on a quote is likely less compared to other competitors. This enables them to review more accounts and produce more quotes. From my perspective, it seems they are not particularly concerned about whether they write an account or not. They operate on the law of large averages because they have created a framework based on risk profiles. These are the terms they offer, and they can do it quickly. If you want modifications later, you can request them, but they start with an initial quote because, in many cases, people just need something to begin with.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2024 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.