Disclaimer: This interview is for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as a basis for investment decisions. In Practise is an independent publisher and all opinions expressed by guests are solely their own opinions and do not reflect the opinion of In Practise.
Analyst 1: I think, in terms of the micro-economics of the situation, each distributor, or each HVAC operator, in the US, tends to be one brand. I think a lot of it has to do with the fact that there is some sort of rewards system for using the same brand and being an outlet for the OEM to generate a lot of volume. I’m sure there is also service support, service training and other factors that contribute to that.
We used to own A.O. Smith, which was in the water heater business. It was a very similar structure, where most plumbers that you would talk to only use one brand. That was because they were well-integrated with their systems, they would get rewards for installing however many water heaters in a year. There is a reason they have those relationships. There is nothing to me that was particularly surprising about that sort of close-knit relationship between Watsco, Carrier and some of its customers.
Analyst 2: It’s funny you mention A.O. Smith because we own them as well. They also have two family-owned companies, have been around for a long time and have a very stable industry structure. The competitive positions are pretty good that way. One of the things l like about it is, these little HVAC distributors are like little local oligopolies, almost. You have a distribution center in Florida and it’s not going to service the one in California.
I don’t know this for sure, but maybe it evolved that way because it used to be that the manufacturers all distributed their own stuff, like Carrier used to. Some of the big ones still do; Trane does. I’m surprised that more don’t because, it seems to me, from what I’ve done, that it’s been a boom for Carrier. Why not the other ones? Maybe that is a potential catalyst down the road that.
Analyst 2: I think they do better if they don’t distribute their own; that’s my understanding. The economics work out better to be a distributor. This is one of the questions I have; I’m not really sure why some of the larger ones continue to distribute their own products when it seems as if the economics favor getting a distributor.
Analyst 3: I think, also, when Carrier had their own distribution, when Watsco basically took over control, the business really boomed. For some reason, they do it much better and maybe it’s just that they want to focus on manufacturing and not on the distribution as well. It’s a different sport and it’s just not their expertise and, I guess, that’s why they use Watsco.
Analyst 2: We just got a new system, actually, and we just picked one of the local contractors and got different ones out to give us bids. They both had different brands; one was Daikin and one was Bryant. I was totally indifferent to the brands. We were more interested in whether they had variable speed, the efficiency and those kind of things. We didn’t care if it was a Bryant or something else. It was really the contractor; they tell you what they have, they try to meet it to your specs and then you go with what you like. You don’t pick the brand at all.
Analyst 4: It was the same story for us. It came more down to our relationship with the HVAC company, the installer, than anything else. They are down the street from us and we know that, if something breaks, they will be here in 10 minutes to fix it. That was a pretty primary reason why we chose the brand that we did. We didn’t look through brands and get multiple offers. This is a company we’ve worked with for a long time and there wasn’t enough differentiation between the brands to justify going with an unknown entity, in terms of service and installation.
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities.
© 2023 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.
Subscribe to access hundreds of interviews and primary research