Disclaimer: This interview is for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as a basis for investment decisions. In Practise is an independent publisher and all opinions expressed by guests are solely their own opinions and do not reflect the opinion of In Practise.
Analyst 1: Clearly, there are differences and I think one way to look at it is to say, okay, CarMax and Carvana focus on the used space which is much larger than the new space; they can get nice scale there. One of the things I like to look at, in terms of these businesses, to measure how well they are doing, is inventory turns. CarMax has higher inventory turns compared to every traditional dealer, except maybe for Asbury, who is approaching that. The way I look at it is, if you compare cars to a Costco model, the whole idea being, if you turn the inventory quicker, you can sell cars for a cheaper price and get the same ROE. You get the economy share by having that type of a system of flywheel set up.
One of the questions I’ve had about Carvana, for which I haven’t yet been able to come up with an answer is, their turns are significantly less than CarMax. They approached CarMax before recession and now they are going back down again. I’m trying to understand what is really going on there. Are they building this giant flywheel that there is no demand for? Can the other folks here bridge my lack of knowledge as to why Carvana has such low inventory turns versus the traditional internet ecommerce model, where the idea is, you do quicker turns, lower margins but you can split the difference with the customer.
Analyst 1: That’s right. They were approaching each other before 2020 and, in 2021, Carvana has gone down and CarMax has gone up. A lot of the other traditional guys have also gone up, but it’s fairly tough to tell as the traditional guys have new cars when there is shortages so you need to pull that out, so they don’t break out the inventory between the two. There is a car company, in China, that I think is probably one of the better ones in the world to study. Its inventory turns are 12X. I think turns are such a good metric because, in this business, you are matching people and cars. The higher the inventory turn, that means you are matching people and cars quicker and, therefore, everybody wins. That whole process of being able to combine the two, is what the objective here is. I’d love to hear other people’s thoughts on that?
Analyst 2: Can I just ask a quick clarifying question on that? Do they all account for inventory the same way or are there are differences? For example, if they just bought it and it’s being reconditioned, could it be in another balance sheet line item, or is it totally consistent across all the publics?
Analyst 1: I’m assuming, amongst the franchises, that it’s pretty consistent. I don’t know if there’s a difference between Carvana and CarMax, in terms of the way they would do it. It’s a good question and I don’t know the answer.
Analyst 2: I’m thinking of CarMax versus some of the others and I can imagine, if you are doing your own reconditioning, so a car is in your inventory, compared to buying a car from an auction, that the auction reconditioned, I wonder if that affects turns. I’m trying to imagine if the metric is strictly apples to apples, across all of them.
Analyst 3: If it’s just a recent thing, it could be just Covid and that kind of thing, where you had a lot of drivers out, potentially, and companies making some noise about that. If that’s the case, then it’s going to be a short-term thing. I don’t know that affected the last-mile delivery or if it affected their delivery, across country, to the reconditioning centers.
Analyst 1: The other company I’ve seen with high turns, in the UK, is Motorpoint. Again, that’s another one that has a high turns model. They have another reason, as well, which is that they are selling slightly used cars and the inventory falls in value very quickly, so they have a huge incentive to sell it very fast. In my mind, I’m thinking of this like a retailer. If you use the retailer model, in this perspective, I think it’s an interesting way to look at it.
That company, in China, that does 12X turns, it’s the highest one in the world. The guy writes an English annual report and it’s interesting to see the way they do stuff. I owned a company in the UK that was taken private, that had the highest turns amongst the UK companies, called Cambria, and you saw some of the stuff they would do, from a customer service perspective; you could tell that the salespeople were motivated to increase those turns.
Analyst 4: On that point, one thing that I’ve been tinkering with and looking at closely, on Carvana, is the amount of inventory sourced from customers. That mix has increased dramatically over the last few years. I wonder if that results in slower turns because there is more product diversity. Maybe the IRC processing times are longer; maybe it’s compounded by labor and logistics issues. They said they bought their millionth car; they probably doubled the cumulative purchases in 2021, or in the last five quarters. They’re buying more than they are selling from retail customers and they’re sourcing the majority of their cars from retail customers, at this point. Maybe the mix has something to do with those slower turns?
Analyst 3: They’re also holding a lot more inventory. If you look at their year-end results, they’ve got three point something billion in inventory, versus about a billion for 2020, so they’ve really scaled up how much inventory they are buying and they are not selling quite as quickly, given the slowdown post Covid. But I think if you look at a longer-term trend, they’ve been improving.
Analyst 1: As you say, they actually approached CarMax before the recession and now they’ve come back down. I was just surprised by the fact that they didn’t keep on going up. I think, if the business model is really working, you would see it inflect up, but maybe there are some shorter-term reasons why not.
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities.
© 2024 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.
Subscribe to access hundreds of interviews and primary research