This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
But Hermès is a world apart. Part of the reason is Hermès doesn't really use celebrities. The product and brand are the celebrities. Dior and Chanel use celebrities, which can be powerful but also fleeting. Hermès consistently walks the walk, and their margins reflect that. Chanel's margins are opaque since it's not a public company, and Dior's are difficult to see. Hermès, however, is the most profitable, with an EBIT margin of 40% or more. Their cash reserves are amazing, and they treat their employees well. The big difference is that while Hermès has a fashion point of view, they are not fashion. Their style is simple, of incredible quality, and well-made. You either like it or you don't; you don't need a celebrity endorsement. Their supply and demand management is perfect, always having more demand than supply.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
Chanel faced backlash this year for dramatically raising prices without a corresponding increase in quality, which may have deteriorated. In terms of desirability, they don't have Karl creating fantasies for us to dive into. We dive into it by wearing Chanel No. 5, buying sunglasses, or a handbag. Fashion hasn't created the desirability you would want, especially since they lost their designer about five months ago. Fashion is important for creating desirability. At Hermès, it's about the artistry; the enamel bracelets, the scarves, the silk, and the handbags. Many people who cherish Hermès are in the top 1% or the 1/10 of 1% globally, not just high-income earners or millionaires.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2025 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.