This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
It depends a lot on the seller's situation and how eager they are to sell. Usually, if they're looking to sell their property at a specific price, we put the ad on Booli to gauge interest. If prospects aren't calling and we notice it's completely dead with no buyers at the asking price, I inform the seller that we probably won't get that price. We discuss whether to lower the price, put the ad on Hemnet, proceed with the selling process, or pause and hope for a better market. Typically, we start by listing it on Booli for a few weeks or months, then proceed to Hemnet.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
Booli doesn't require us to post listings directly. When we put an ad on our website, Booli takes it automatically. We don't list directly on Booli, but we've noticed a significant increase in buyers asking about properties on Booli. They often say they saw it on Booli. We've been using Booli more because it provides all listings. Hemnet only shows listings where the seller has purchased an ad. I think the value of Booli is that buyers can find everything. However, there's still a difference because some buyers haven't learned about Booli yet. Hemnet is a way to advertise to everyone, but Booli captures the majority of the market. My take on Booli is positive; the seller doesn't have to pay for it. However, I feel Hemnet offers better features, and its brand is more valuable than Booli because not everyone knows Booli yet, which is a factor that separates them.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
Yes, I would say maybe 60% to 70% of my listings always start on Booli. If I don't get any interest within the first couple of weeks, I usually recommend the seller to put it out on Hemnet.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2025 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.