This is a snippet of the transcript.Contact Salesto get full access.
When I started at Hemnet, it was just after General Atlantic and Sprints had acquired Hemnet. I was previously at Schibsted, and we were about to buy Hemnet, but the Swedish government didn't allow it because we were too large. At that time, a property ad was around $150. During my tenure, we launched two new packages, Plus and Premium. The idea was that with three options, customers would likely choose at least the middle one. Recently, they launched Max as a new product. If an ad was $150 when I started, Max is now about $3,000 for the package. The strategy was that $150 was too cheap for an ad, and we worked on finding the right value for what an ad should cost, looking at other markets as well. Initially, revenue from advertising was about 50%, and ads were also 50%. Now, it's around 80% for property ads.
This is a snippet of the transcript.Contact Salesto get full access.
I think that's the point I mentioned. Real estate agents are now trying to sell properties without using Hemnet due to the market for Hemnet. I should say Booli is not a big competitor in a way because it's state-owned, focusing on creating competition among banks mostly and acquiring new customers through their site for loans. I have friends working at Booli now, and they don't have a strategy to increase revenue from ads or anything like that. It's just a good service they want to provide. I know Schibsted, for instance, has been looking to buy Booli, but it's not for sale.
This is a snippet of the transcript.Contact Salesto get full access.
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2025 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.