FTAI Aviation: CFM56 LLP and USM Parts
Former Executive at FTAI Aviation
inpractise.com/articles/ftai-aviation-cfm56-llp-and-usm-parts
FTAI Aviation: CFM56 LLP and USM Parts(July 31, 2024)
Former Executive at FTAI Aviation
Interview Transcript
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
That's what I was getting at. But is this just a commodity, really? What are you doing that is unique apart from owning that many engines?
Owning that many engines and having the maintenance support. Yes, having our own QuickTurn shop, which does module swaps, and having the maintenance at Lockheed. Our maintenance cost is not $7 million like everyone else when going to Lufthansa or MTU. That's a benefit too. It's the whole picture. Being able to supply our own parts is significant. We can essentially do everything that people would need multiple vendors to do. Anytime you can have it in-house, there are big benefits. You have to make it work, but we do it. That's the benefit.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
Related Content
Copyright Notice
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2024 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.