Partner Interview
Published December 11, 2023
Fortinet: Competitive Landscape & SASE Transition
inpractise.com/articles/fortinet-competitive-landscape-and-sase-transition
Executive Bio
Former Major Accounts Manager at Fortinet
Interview Transcript
Disclaimer: This interview is for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as a basis for investment decisions. In Practise is an independent publisher and all opinions expressed by guests are solely their own opinions and do not reflect the opinion of In Practise.
This is a snippet of the transcript.to get full access.
That's an excellent overview. I would like to clarify a few points. It seems like the Opaque network integration largely failed. If I were to pinpoint the most challenging aspect, it appears that the original plan was to have hardware in the Equinix data center, essentially building your own PoPs. However, integrating the client proved to be difficult and building the PoPs was quite costly. Were these the two main challenges?
The issue with Fortinet was that they didn't want to fully step into the SASE market. They were cautious about cannibalizing hardware sales and wanted to slowly transition into SASE. I believe there were several factors at play here, and it became quite political. The question was whether to fully commit to SASE, which everyone knew was the right direction.
This is a snippet of the transcript.to get full access.
That's an excellent overview. I would like to clarify a few points. It seems like the Opaque network integration largely failed. If I were to pinpoint the most challenging aspect, it appears that the original plan was to have hardware in the Equinix data center, essentially building your own PoPs. However, integrating the client proved to be difficult and building the PoPs was quite costly. Were these the two main challenges?
My guess is that Fortinet was cautious about the cost and didn't want to cannibalize their hardware. They weren't fully committed to SASE but felt the need to transition because everyone else was doing so. They chose the less expensive route, using their existing FortiClient, which most of their customer base already uses.
This is a snippet of the transcript.to get full access.
That's an excellent overview. I would like to clarify a few points. It seems like the Opaque network integration largely failed. If I were to pinpoint the most challenging aspect, it appears that the original plan was to have hardware in the Equinix data center, essentially building your own PoPs. However, integrating the client proved to be difficult and building the PoPs was quite costly. Were these the two main challenges?
However, most of their customers were using Zscaler. This was during the pandemic when remote access VPN was challenging to use. Employees were connecting from remote networks, and there were concerns about security and user experience. This led to an increased interest in secure remote access and SASE. That's why we were bought, and Fortinet felt obligated to get into the market. It was a complex situation.
Free Sample of 50+ Interviews
Sign up to test our content quality with a free sample of 50+ interviews.
Or contact sales for full access
Related Content

Zscaler: Sales Org & Competition in SASE
Former Sales Executive at Zscaler

Palo Alto, Zscaler & SASE Market: Pricing Dynamics and Competition
Former Regional Sales Manager at Palo Alto Networks

Dynatrace: Cybersecurity & Observability Customer Perspective
VP of IT at Fox Rent-a-Car

Cogent: Sprint Fiber Longevity & Monetization Challenges
Former VP at Ciena
© 2024 In Practise. All rights reserved. This material is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as investment advice.