Ferrari: Organisational Structure

Former Chief Product Officer and SVP Production Processes at Ferrari

Why is this interview interesting?

  • How Ferrari organizes the Executive Team and wider business
Print

Executive Bio

Ervino Riccobon

Former Chief Product Officer and SVP Production Processes at Ferrari

Ervino has 24 years experience in the auto industry. He spent 18 years at Mckinsey as a consultant in the advanced industry practice with the majority of his time in the automotive segment. After working with Ferrari throughout his time at McKinsey, the luxury automaker created a new role that concentrated on creating cost competitiveness with responsibilities of purchasing and manufacturing efficiency. Ervino saw the company transition from a business within a large mass automaker to a standalone publicly listed luxury sport automaker. He was one of a small team of Executive Officers at Ferrari during a crucial period of the company's history. Read more

View Profile Page

Interview Transcript

What's the structure from the top down in Ferrari?

The structure is pretty traditional. You have the CTO, chief technical officer; you have manufacturing and technology, so a chief manufacturing officer; then you have a chief marketing and sales officer, who holds the subsidiaries and sales and pricing and marketing; then of course you have a CFO; then you have a chief design guy, who is obviously a very important person in your organisation; and you have the head of the Formula 1 team, so the managing director of Formula 1. That's the top management team. Of course, you have other functions that are important to the operation like legal, et cetera. But these are the guys who make up the group executive council.

So it's unusual for the purchasing guy to report to the chief technical officer?

It's completely unusual. It's instrumental in delivering the product development of new cars in the context where the contribution of suppliers is so critical. Typically, you split the two functions quite clearly, so that there’s no overlap.

And that drives accountability in terms of integrating with the supply chain and driving the technical performance of the car.

The most important issue is that when you develop new cars, which, by definition is doing something that is unheard of or unproven or up to the limit of performance, you need to have your suppliers on board to deliver that performance, because otherwise you won't deliver the car. So, it’s so important to have purchasing as a product development leader, which is why purchasing reports to the chief technical officer.

What are the big challenges with this model?

Every model has its pros and cons. The challenge is obviously the pressure. How do you make sure that you also have a focus on efficiency and on product cost reduction? That is precisely the reason why my function was created, to create product competitiveness. I was exactly in between the two of them to run cost transparency and to make sure that the products were developed with the right fixed costs, so capex and R&D on one side, but also with the right variable costs. So it's driving purchasing and manufacturing efficiency, that was my primary objective. At the end, people tend to underestimate it, but the cost of the car is very critical. It's a clear component of profitability. Ferrari is making money not only because of price but also because the cost is good, otherwise you don't make money at the end. It's not only because of price power. Yes, price power is a clear factor, but the cars are cost-effective as well.

Sign up to read the full interview and hundreds more.
Did you like this article ?