This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
Pre-pandemic, it's useful to break this down a bit more. In 2016 and 2017, most of the supply came from multi-brand partners or boutiques. Around that time, I can't specify exactly when, but brands started to grow. There was a very intentional decision by José and the commercial team to really expand the share of brands. Over the years, that share continued to grow. With the acquisition of New Guards Group (NGG) in 2019, which I guess was during the pandemic, there was also a huge commitment to growing the 1P stock from Browns.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
The bargaining power was much greater with brands. The conversations were more challenging, and more resources had to be allocated to serve those brands, both commercially and operationally. The commissions were significantly lower as well. In the end, concessions essentially allow those brands to connect multiple stop points to work through a single channel with Farfetch.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
From a sourcing perspective, commissions with brands were much lower than boutiques. However, their demands for a working relationship with us placed a huge burden on boutiques and impacted their performance. Essentially, there were two major drivers. One was what we call geopricing. Prices were set by the brands, and we tried to follow them. For example, in Europe, things tend to be cheaper than in Asia. So, if we were selling from a stock point in Europe to Asia, we would have to price it according to the price defined for Asia. This was not because it would give us a huge competitive advantage price-wise. We kind of survived that one, which was pre-pandemic, and it was fine, I guess.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2025 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.
Subscribe to access hundreds of interviews and primary research