This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
The concept with rural areas was interesting. When I left, the number of mature clubs wasn't the largest part yet because most mature clubs at that time were still the first ones, the bigger ones. In mature areas, they were calculated with lower rents, leading to a faster return on investment with fewer members. We always aimed for a number of members, around 3,200 to 3,250, to have a mature club. This was based on rent in larger cities. In smaller areas, where rent is lower, you can have fewer members and still achieve a profit margin above 30%. So, the number of members needed for a successful club was lower than the 3,200 required for maturity, and it would be higher for a club in Paris due to higher rents.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
We kept a long-term focus on expansion and new clubs, but didn't start early enough to invest more in capital expenditure for the mature clubs, the first mature clubs from 2018 and 2019. I know they're doing it now.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
Because the 30% return was so ingrained. We cannot accept a location unless we're sure it will achieve 30%. Of course, there will be a few selected quickly that might not make it, but that's always been part of the process. If you want to capture the market quickly, some will be less successful. However, if that percentage remains low, it doesn't mean the new clubs will be less successful. I've seen clubs that were in the best areas when opened, but over time, cities change. For example, a new neighborhood or commercial zone might develop elsewhere, affecting club performance. It's not due to poor selection but rather changes over time. So, some clubs may be less successful, but not because of recent openings or too many Basic-Fits.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2025 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.