This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
I do not know exactly the breakdown of what the highest margin is for them, for example, but I know the more that customers that adopt Graviton, that is something that helps them with that. Obviously, you see Amazon passing a lot of those savings forward to customers, because Graviton is so much cheaper than the equivalent. But I am not really sure what drives the majority of those margins. If they keep getting better economies of scale and can drive down the cost of their instances, they can decide to take that out of margin and drive more usage. You always have to think about when you are doing pricing, is this something that is margin additive to EC2 or is it something that just drives EC2 usage. What do we actually care about here. Some of the services are built to be value add on top of EC2 and you’re paying for the value.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
That is definitely one of the main focuses. EC2 is obviously one of the largest businesses inside of the company. Everyone is consuming some degree of EC2 and, as long as that keeps growing, the company has great prospects. But you do see services like S3 and DynamoDB, in particular, becoming the standard for developers. If you are looking at a NoSQL database or if you are looking at an object store, you do see continued growth in a lot of these value-added services on top of it. I do not think there is a huge risk of commodification, in general, just because there are so many value-add services on top that seem to be really the incumbent in a certain space. At least from a developer’s perspective, this is what I would use.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2024 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.
Subscribe to access hundreds of interviews and primary research