This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
The planning systems were based on historical data, such as seasonality demands and parcel movements. Once they had that data, they would create dummy containers and provide them to execution. When warehouse personnel received such an order, they would fill up those empty or dummy containers. Many people were lobbying for a clean system where planning only does planning, and execution takes over the actuals. However, the legacy system dictated what items needed to go into a container, which became a nightmare to integrate with Manhattan.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
I believe most of the systems are still in legacy. There is no clean transfer over to TMS. I know there were parts of middle mile that were moved to TMS. However, when I left, all these systems still interacted with the legacy system. Even if we didn't use the front-end legacy system, we needed the existing systems to transmit data to the yard management system, warehouse management system, and the data science team. Essentially, we just changed the UI from a legacy system to the Manhattan UI, but the backend was still using the legacy system.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
It's a very patched-up system. If someone tries to decouple or detach the system, something would break. So everybody is scared to take that risk. Nobody wants to be the person who might be the fall guy. It's very slow and cautious, and I think it could have been more efficient.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2025 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.
Subscribe to access hundreds of interviews and primary research