The expert is a former Associate Director at Wayfair. He was involved in developing Wayfair's logistics strategies, particularly in transporting containers to dropship networks. He managed the U.S. destination process, including container drayage from ports to various distribution points.
Disclaimer: This interview is for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as a basis for investment decisions. In Practise is an independent publisher and all opinions expressed by guests are solely their own opinions and do not reflect the opinion of In Practise.
Part of why I joined Wayfair in 2019 was for a similar reason. They were just beginning to move containers on their own ocean carrier contracts into CastleGate facilities. From my conversations before joining them in 2019, Amazon was still very self-serving, and no one was really providing these logistics capabilities outside of their own bubble. Wayfair's vision was to figure it out for big and bulky items for their own purposes and then sell those capabilities externally, to big and bulky suppliers who want to sell freight through other channels.
This way, they could capture some revenue from sales that their sellers push through other channels. They could even extend beyond that and become a digital freight forwarder in the marketplace, competing with companies like Flexport if they could figure it out on the tech side and create an efficient product for their internal customers.
That was a compelling value proposition that attracted me. I aimed to figure out how to take those capabilities that serve the CastleGate facilities and apply them to the dropship warehouses, providing freight services for goods that may not even be sold on Wayfair. This was a major draw for me. It's an interesting value proposition of building a business within a business to serve not just Wayfair but also the freight market in general.
They could offer competitive ocean rates that sellers couldn't get on their own. Wayfair is in the same league as Amazon, Home Depot, or Overstock in securing competitive ocean rates. They can get comparable rates to those other big retailers. However, they would excel with the smaller sellers who are much smaller than Wayfair in aggregate. They can upcharge the ocean freight and sell it to a Wayfair supplier, creating a win-win situation. The Wayfair supplier gets a better rate than they could on their own, and Wayfair makes a margin on the container.
The value proposition is there if they can create a winning product and point it externally. The same applies to the warehouses. If they can make the CastleGate facilities multi-channel fulfillment centers, they could take in products and ship them, even if sold on Overstock or other sales channels.
Correct. If they could tell a supplier, "We'll be your 3PL. We don't care if you sell it on Wayfair or not. We'll fulfill and ship that product for you," it would generate more interest from suppliers to store products in the CastleGate network. When I was there, it was very much a Wayfair-only fulfillment center, and suppliers were sometimes hesitant to store too much product because it would be captive to the Wayfair sales channel.
In ocean freight, Wayfair's size puts them at the equivalent of a top 20 importer. The volume they bring in means the rates they get are similar to those of Walmart, Amazon, Home Depot, or Target. These big four might get slightly cheaper rates, but it's not a significant step change, like 10% or 20% lower than what the next tier of shippers would get.
Yes, there is a difference, but it's not significant enough to be a huge competitive advantage, especially if the intention is to add a margin to that freight and sell it as an NVO to a much smaller shipper.
I would estimate it at about $100 less per container that a company like Walmart might get on ocean freight to the West Coast, maybe a bit more to the East Coast, compared to a mid-sized shipper.
Out of $2,000, or $3,000.
Yes, ocean rates can be quite volatile, depending on the market. There are certainly advantages to size, but the advantage diminishes.
The drayage market is highly fragmented and specialized within trucking. Wayfair never wanted its own fleet of drayage trucks or drivers. We issued an RFP and secured third-party drayage providers to handle the size, scale, and variability of our volume. We outsourced this function but managed and oversaw operations, deciding whether to use trucker A or B. Rates and capabilities might differ, but external parties owned the assets, employed the drivers, and picked up the containers, regardless of their destination.
IMC is a big one, along with Cargomatic, and Schneider. There are also some regionally specific carriers we used in certain markets. For example, in Los Angeles, we worked with a company called Dray Alliance and another called HUDD, which is actually a Maersk subsidiary that does a lot of drayage for us.
Are you asking about an RFP-type selection process or something else?
For any given port or warehouse, we typically had about three carriers supporting that lane, with a lane being the port and warehouse pair. We allocated our volume across those carriers based on their available capacity. Depending on market fluctuations and their other customers, they might have fewer truckers available one week than the next. We managed their capacity, the volume we anticipated, and the arrival cadence of that volume. For instance, having 100 containers arrive on the same ship at a port is more challenging to handle within a few days than if those 100 containers are spread out as 20 per day over five different ships. We assessed arrival patterns, available capacity, and also considered empty containers at the warehouse that needed to be returned to the port. We sought efficiencies by having a trucker complete a full round trip, taking a full load to the warehouse and returning an empty to the port to minimize costs. This was a continual daily operation to evaluate these variables and make the best decisions based on cost and reliability.
Yes, roughly. Some lanes had fewer, some had more. For dropship warehouses, we often dedicated just one trucker because the volume was so low that having two truckers would have been excessive.
Yes, a supplier warehouse might receive two containers a month, something like that. You don't need more than one trucker to support that volume.
Drayage is all point-to-point pricing, not mileage-based or zone-based like some trucking segments. It's from the Port of New Jersey to the warehouse address. We include this in our RFP, specifying the lanes we're running and the volume in those lanes. Each trucker calculates their own numbers, often depending on their location relative to these points. They provide a rate, and we select one, locking it in at, say, $500 per container. This includes pickup from the port, drop-off at the warehouse, and returning the empty container to the port. They give us a base rate for that round trip. On top of that fixed base rate, we add surcharges. The fuel surcharge is typically 30% to 35%, varying with the fuel market. There are daily charges for the chassis, around $30 per day. Sometimes there's storage if the trucker holds the container overnight. Additional fees may apply for one-way trips or taking the container to a different location before the warehouse. The core is the fixed base rate.
Correct. If it's an overweight container, special roads and a special chassis are needed, incurring extra charges as a surcharge on top of the base rate. A Hazmat container, rare for Wayfair, incurs extra costs due to special permitting or a driver with specific credentials.
Yes.
Correct. Even if you ship a 20-foot container instead of a 40-foot one, the trucker charges the same because the work is the same regardless of container size.
Let me see if I can come up with a good example for you. I'm drawing from my current experience here. For instance, I'm in Savannah, which is comparable to where Wayfair's warehouse is located in the Savannah region. The base plus the fuel surcharge versus everything else, like landed, is roughly 1/3. So, it's like a 30% to 35% markup with all the additional fees associated with the move.
Yes, if it's going to a dropship warehouse, that would be passed through to the supplier. However, it's not a profit markup; it's a markup of just surcharges on top of that.
We experimented with this a bit. We typically added about 10%. Sometimes we tried to add a little more, sometimes we negotiated it down, but it was challenging. We found it difficult to upcharge drayage and pass that through to suppliers. They would often say they could find a cheaper rate elsewhere.
They would accuse us of overcharging because they could find cheaper drayage elsewhere. Our value proposition was that we handled the ocean and drayage together as one, taking all of that off their plate. Usually, they saved enough on the ocean that a slightly more expensive drayage price was acceptable. We aimed to make the whole package a beneficial value proposition for them.
We typically add the 10% to the base rate.
Let's say a hypothetical base rate is $200, and then the fuel surcharges might be $50 or $75, and other fees might be another $50 or $75. We would only add the 10% to that $200 base rate. Then we would send that straight through.
Yes, because it's very transparent. When we bill them, we have to provide line item details on some of these things. Adding a markup on a surcharge sometimes looked bad and, in other cases, was not allowed by the FMC.
I don't know much about Amazon's trade program, so I can't speak to that. I would hesitate to say that Amazon is able to get competitive rates on drayage compared to anyone, really. There is some benefit that accrues to a large importer because there's volume and consistency that are attractive to a trucker.
However, as a large or even mid-size importer, you can't rely on a million independent owner-operators to support your freight. You need tier one trucking providers with the service levels, technological capabilities, and capacity to support your volume, which usually comes at a premium.
While you might get a good discount on that premium rate, you're still using an IMC, Schneider, or Cargomatic, some of the largest drayage providers in the country, instead of Joe Schmo's Trucking, who just happens to have the port credentials and will get your container for next to nothing.
We would hear from suppliers who say they know someone who could do it cheaper, but that type of trucker can't fit in our portfolio as a large importer. There's a challenge to being competitive in the drayage market because your requirements become much more difficult to fulfill.
We mandated that they could not. We sold it as a package. They needed to do both ocean and drayage to be in the program. Part of the reason for that was the handoff became a huge space for errors and issues.
If they have their own trucker and we are providing the ocean service, it becomes our responsibility to communicate with their trucker, ensuring they get arrival and customs clearance information and all the particulars needed to get that container. This becomes a burden for whoever's handling the ocean piece. We didn't want to work with a hundred random supplier-chosen truckers. We wanted to work with a handful of vetted, high-quality truckers with whom we had relationships and technological integrations to minimize errors.
When something goes wrong in a handoff and the container gets stuck at the port, it can incur expensive demurrage fees that add up quickly. Then everyone starts pointing fingers; suppliers at us, us at the trucker, and the trucker at the supplier. No one wants to own those fees. All that debate goes away if we at Wayfair handle both legs. We tell them not to worry, don't get involved. We'll make sure it gets there, and if there are fees, that's on us.
Yes, the truckers would give us better rates to our own facility than to a supplier's facility because there's more density there. They can keep their truckers busy going back and forth with full and empty containers.
I would say probably 5% to 10% cheaper. It's not a huge markup unless it's a particularly difficult situation. For example, we had a supplier in downtown Philadelphia with no parking spaces, which resulted in a much higher rate than a warehouse next door would have.
Yes.
Yes, there was a different pricing model for coming into the CastleGate network compared to their own dropship warehouse.
Since the CastleGate network is specific to goods sold on Wayfair, there was high assurance that all the product in that container is Wayfair product. From a pricing standpoint, there was a willingness to charge the freight either flat or even subsidize it a little to encourage goods into the Wayfair network. When shipping goods into the dropship network, we don't know how much will ultimately be sold on Wayfair. So, there was a strict policy not to subsidize freight going into the dropship network because we didn't want to subsidize competitor sales.
Correct. We are marking up the base because it's meant to be a revenue stream for Wayfair to provide this freight service for sellers into their dropship warehouses.
Anecdotally, from my conversations with suppliers, about 10% to 20% of the goods moved into their dropship facilities ended up being Wayfair product. A significant amount was sold elsewhere.
It would probably be pretty close to just the flat one hundred with the surcharges, in most cases, unless they were a strategic supplier or there was some negotiating push on the Wayfair merchandising side. They might say, for example, if we drop our price by 5%, they'll give us an extra 5% volume into the Wayfair network. Conversations like that, which are outside of my purview, would happen on the merchandising side to encourage higher penetration into the CastleGate network with strategic suppliers. It wasn't available to everybody. There's a list of strategic suppliers that received more attention from Wayfair because of their product mix.
Yes, there is an incentive to move into the CastleGate warehouse. It's important to note the context of when I was there, which was during Covid and the post-Covid times. During that period, manufacturing was difficult, so the supply of goods was challenging, and sales for home goods were sometimes sky-high. Everyone was trying to hedge their bets and be a little bit selfish at the same time. Suppliers wanted more control in their own warehouses to give them optionality on sales channels, while Wayfair wanted more inventory in their network for selection and cost-effectiveness within the CastleGate network. There was a strategic push and pull where Wayfair was constantly trying to encourage more inventory into CastleGate, while suppliers had the opposite perspective during those challenging months and years.
Once containers arrive at a port, they have four free days before they start to incur fees. As soon as it docks, you'll arrange for a trucker to pick it up before that four-day window expires. Typically, the warehouses are about 40 to 60 miles away from a port, which is the typical range for drayage. It's just a few-hour trip for a trucker to pick up the container and drop it off. It's not a multi-day journey.
I don't think so. At Wayfair, they tended to have a large parcel facility and a small parcel facility and were willing to take hot tubs or gazebos, some pretty large items, into their network. My understanding was that it was much more driven by the sales characteristics of each product. Wayfair wanted to prioritize higher-turn, higher-margin, or higher-damage-rate products into the CastleGate network to maximize the cost-effectiveness of their buildings.
No, I really couldn't. Aside from knowing what types of items Wayfair wanted, I mostly just saw containers moving. I didn't typically know or draw patterns between what's in the box, so to speak.
When it comes to a supplier's warehouse, we intentionally kept an arm's length from some of the product details. If we tried to get too close, they would be resistant to using our services because they saw Wayfair somewhat as a threat. They were afraid of being "Amazoned," if you will, if they revealed too much information about their goods or factory addresses.
I don't know much about that. I don't know much about the middle mile network, but you are correct in that Wayfair did have a fleet of trucks they used to run goods into the delivery network. However, I wasn't involved in that part of the logistics puzzle.
Yes, exactly.
I wasn't deeply involved in this process, so I don't know the specifics of the logic. However, there was a regional fulfillment strategy aimed at being as close to the end customer as possible with the stocking strategy. Some logic looked at sales patterns regionally. For instance, in the winter, we wouldn't send patio sets to the Northeast as frequently as to the Los Angeles region. There was logic that considered who was buying what and when throughout the year. Freight recommendations would then be made to ship specific collections of SKUs to designated destinations.
It could be comparable, or it might even be cheaper. As a small shipper, you might not need the sophistication that Wayfair requires for their drayage provider. You could potentially go to a brokerage, put your load out there, and get a very cheap rate or a one-off drayage from someone you might not need to contact again.
Typically, no. The drayage leg is usually not where damage occurs. It's also challenging to determine if and when damage happens during that stage because the drayage leg is a short over-the-road move at the end of the cycle. The container is sealed, and you would know if the seal is broken before it reaches the warehouse. Generally, goods are packed to withstand a journey from a factory in China to the US. Once the container is sealed at the factory, it is trucked to a port in China, moves through the port onto a vessel, crosses the ocean to the US, and is then trucked to the warehouse. If any damage occurs, it's difficult to pinpoint at which stage of the journey it happened.
We were not able to facilitate that.
What we could do is split it within CastleGate, sending half to the West Coast and half to the East Coast, but both would end up at a CastleGate facility. While I was there, we didn't progress enough to split a container between CastleGate and dropship networks due to pricing complexities. If they use a cheap rate to get into CastleGate and then decide to send some to their own warehouses, it involves a different rate sheet. There's some complexity to it.
It depends. Some suppliers have warehouses close to each other, and you could use the same trucker to stop off at one warehouse, unload half the container, and then take it to another warehouse to unload the rest. But if we wanted to split the container and send it to two different geographies, we weren't able to do that type of move, which we call LCL or less than container load.
Yes, they would charge extra for that. It would be doable if the trucker could make a short run to different warehouses on the same journey. But that was a future evolution we hadn't built out yet when I was there, as it adds a lot of complexity to the operation. We were trying to keep it simple.
When the containers are arranged at the origin, they have a destination attached to them in the paperwork. We know before the container is packed at the factory that it's going to a specific destination. We track it with a container number all the way to its destination.
Yes, there's a manifest listing the products, and the supplier provides this to a customs broker for the commercial invoice and necessary documentation. This is processed while the container is on the water. We know when customs clearance is received, the container number, and its destination. We then inform the trucker, who picks up the specific container and takes it to the designated destination.
Yes, that is primarily true. We established two facilities, one in Los Angeles and one in Savannah, for a third-party deconsolidation process. We could send containers to these centers, open them, and perform cross-docking. They would distribute goods to multiple destinations. This was a CastleGate-specific operation and did not involve supplier warehouses at the time. It allowed us to send a full container to Savannah and then split it, sending trucks to New Jersey, Florida, and Kentucky, for example.
Correct, at the time we launched it, that was true. There were aspirations to eventually reach that point, but I never saw it happen. Since I left, I've heard rumors that the deconsolidation process has been shut down, so I'm not sure if it still exists.
Yes, yes.
It was a bit of a pilot to see if we could better support this regional stocking strategy in a cost-effective way by funneling goods through the deconsolidation center instead of sending full containers to every single region. When I was there, we were learning and did it for about a year before I left, trying to see if it was cost-effective. I guess it wasn't, or it was challenging enough that they decided not to continue.
The alternative is to send it to a warehouse and use Wayfair labor to break the container apart. Then they could potentially use the middle mile network to get it to the correct warehouse. This adds complexity and throughput to the middle mile network, but if they can support it, it could be a more cost-effective alternative.
Part of it is what you're talking about, and part of it was smaller factories not shipping a whole container worth of product regularly. We could combine them and send them at once. But those decisions need to be made months before a container arrives in the US, like one to two months. If we can get the container to the US before deciding the destination, theoretically, we might make a better stocking decision because we're closer to the endpoint. So there are some trade-offs there.
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2025 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.
The expert is a former Associate Director at Wayfair. He was involved in developing Wayfair's logistics strategies, particularly in transporting containers to dropship networks. He managed the U.S. destination process, including container drayage from ports to various distribution points.
Subscribe to access hundreds of interviews and primary research