This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
The approach is a bit different on the industrial side most of the time. Some of it can be regulatory-driven. For example, if regulatory bodies say our TOC levels must drop by 10%, we have to meet those requirements. However, most of the time, it's about whether it makes sense and makes money. If I can sell them an automated system to catch the TOC dump and prevent it from going to the city—from an industrial plant to municipal—where they would get fined for breaking their TOC permit, then it makes sense. I can point out that they were fined three times last year, costing them $90,000. My system costs $60,000. If this happens every year, there's a clear return on investment. Yes, often in industrial settings, it comes down to a return on investment.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
Yes, it's more EPA-driven. Consider an upset where you dump a large amount of methanol into the drainage ditch. It will reach the municipal water treatment and kill all their biological treatment sources. Then they have to reset their plant, and they can't have any effluent going out because their biological processes aren't working anymore. It causes a huge chain reaction.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
Okay. Often, the effluent will be plumbed directly into their lab, providing a constant stream. At any point, they can take a grab sample and run it in the lab. So, we're discussing whether we need to send our samples out to someone else for testing or if we have a certified lab to test everything ourselves. If you have a certified lab, you need to invest in stocking that lab. Alternatively, you spend money to send it out to someone else with a certified lab. Certification ensures that the measurements are accurate. If I claim my total organic carbons are one part per billion, what's my reference? How do I know that's correct? Certified labs must maintain very tight records on calibrations, including when the last calibration was done and the updated calibration standards used.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2025 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.
Subscribe to access hundreds of interviews and primary research