This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
The second difference lies in the direction of the market in terms of market players. The Latin market is aggressively moving away from traditional recording agreements, with several new market players emerging. To compete, we need to be creative in structuring deals. This transition is also happening in the US, but at a slower pace. The same applies to digitalization. A few years ago, the Latin market became almost entirely digital. The US market's transition to digital was slower, with physical formats still being prevalent. In the Latin market, physical formats account for maybe 1% or even less, while in the US, it's probably around 10% to 12%. These are the key differences between the two markets.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
I cannot provide exact figures as they are confidential, but there has been a significant change. We've had to adapt to market conditions and the increased leverage artists now have. In the Latin market, there has been a shift from artists signing with traditional music labels or majors to becoming independent. To achieve this, they either sign with a distribution company or a management company that handles their distribution. Due to their increased leverage, we've had to adapt and, in most cases, reduce our share.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
It will definitely have an impact. A company's value is made up of its catalog and new releases. The fewer artists we sign, the less catalog we will have. That's why companies are now including mergers and acquisitions in their strategies. We look at an artist's catalog to see if it's profitable. It's a way to adapt to new market conditions.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2024 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.
Subscribe to access hundreds of interviews and primary research