This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
Generally, we tend to be dissatisfied with our suppliers. For instance, Amgen began to transition away from glass because we were not pleased with Becton Dickinson (BD). We had issues with their investigations among other things. This dissatisfaction seems to be the norm now. However, other companies find it challenging to make such changes due to the cost, time, and regulatory expectations involved. If a process change is required to accommodate a new raw material, it becomes an even larger hurdle as it may necessitate bioequivalency studies.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
When you're building a glass plant, the line you build to make vials is not the same as the one you build to make syringes. Cartridges and vials are more similar, although they also have aspects of syringes. They are like a hybrid piece of equipment because they have openings on both sides, unlike a vial, which is only open on one side. So, if I have excess capacity in syringes, I can't just change parts or the machine and start making more vials.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
Similarly, if I am producing a lot of vials and have recently purchased equipment to make more vials for the pharmaceutical industry due to the vaccines, I can't easily convert those into syringes. They require different equipment and different lines. On the positive side, Stevanato manufactures the glass forming equipment and sells it to companies, including Corning and some of their competitors, which I find surprising. However, they also have to buy cane from these companies, so there's a need for cooperation. It would be quite easy for Corning, for example, to decide to keep everything during a shortage.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2024 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.
Subscribe to access hundreds of interviews and primary research