This is a snippet of the transcript.Contact Salesto get full access.
Many trucking companies are truckload-focused. At least on the brokerage side, we're trying to introduce a concept called a partial. It's similar to LTL to compete against it. As a shipper, if you don't have enough freight to fill a full truck but have more than a pallet, you might have three or four pallets. For example, if your manufacturing facility is in Portland, Oregon, and you're shipping to Kansas City, Missouri, you would partner with a service provider, typically a brokerage, that offers partials. It's very LTL-like. The provider can find three or four similar-sized companies in Portland or a large shipper with room for two or three more pallets. You do multiple stops at the origin point, load up a full truckload, and take it directly to Kansas City, making multiple deliveries. This is typically faster than LTL, with fewer damages, and it's priced to appeal to smaller shippers. The largest shipper in that truckload has essentially paid for the truck, allowing you to offer discounts to the other shippers relative to LTL costs.
This is a snippet of the transcript.Contact Salesto get full access.
If you say 24 pallets will fit on a 53-foot dry van trailer, sometimes 26 if you pinwheel the pallets. As a shipper, I always had about 12 pallets. We found that if I have 13 pallets, I'm going to ship the truck half empty for all practical purposes. But that is a cheaper proposition than shipping those 13 pallets via LTL because of the LTL's super high cost. It's high-cost freight to ship, and the break-even depends on lanes. In general, if you can fill up half a truck, it's cheaper to go point-to-point than to go through an LTL provider network. You're probably going to get the freight there a day or two faster.
This is a snippet of the transcript.Contact Salesto get full access.
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2025 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.
Subscribe to access hundreds of interviews and primary research