This is a snippet of the transcript.Contact Salesto get full access.
Yes, in my roadmap, that was the long-term transition. I had around 120 to 125 exempt IT folks on my team in the U.S. to manage all of the WMS systems. If I compare that to how we managed WMS at Amazon in the early days, when we had 300 warehouses, David Glick probably had 40 or 50 people. It was a very different setup, with speed and transaction volumes of a different magnitude. My SG&A spend was linear relative to sales, which didn't make sense to me. I wasn't gaining economies of scale with the system, nor was I able to spend enough to keep up with the next best thing from a customer integration perspective. My five-year plan was to deprecate and roll out. We tried to roll smaller customers into WMx, but my cost structure still required me to charge a lot, and it wasn't as good a system. When customers who paid 50 cents are now asked to pay three dollars, they want to know what's better. If I say it just does everything, but now I can do upgrades, they see no benefit other than a higher charge. Blue Yonder, with its labor management system, offers specific incremental benefits compared to what we could claim. I was the U.S. CIO for two and a half years, so I believe my understanding is accurate. I'm hands-on and learn a lot by doing and observing processes. For example, at Amazon, it took three clicks to process a return, while WMx required 26 clicks when I first arrived. Many of those steps made no sense and were outdated, yet still required. That's a challenge.
This is a snippet of the transcript.Contact Salesto get full access.




This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2025 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.



