FTAI & CFM56 MRO Supply vs Demand
Head of Engines at Magnetic MRO
inpractise.com/articles/ftai-and-cfm56-mro-supply-vs-demand
FTAI & CFM56 MRO Supply vs Demand(August 5, 2024)
Head of Engines at Magnetic MRO
Interview Transcript
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
But could that be a risk if all the airlines switch to Leap much quicker than expected and then, for FTAI, the number of shop visits for the CFM could be lower than expected in 2030 because people switch quicker to Leap.
But those engines that remain, and we will talk about some 6,000 5Bs and probably 10,000 7Bs, will need module swaps. Five to six years from now, people will not even be thinking about core performance restorations on 5B and 7B. So, I don't think FTAI got it wrong. I think they actually got it right. If they are making enough money per module and everything works, and they have the profit, I think they got it right.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
Related Content
CFM56 Engine: LLPs and HPT Blades
Head of Engines at Magnetic MRO
FTAI Aviation: Customers, LPT Swaps & Core Restoration Risks
Former Engineering Director, FTAI Aviation
MTU Aero, FTAI, & Pratt & Whitney: V2500 & CFM56 Overhaul
Former CEO of MTU Maintenance, MTU Aero Engines
FTAI, Chromalloy & the CFM56 HPT Blade PMA
Copyright Notice
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2024 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.