This is a snippet of the transcript.Contact Salesto get full access.
In terms of synergies between the two companies, the biggest benefit to FanDuel was the traders and the trading platform that Paddy Power brought in. Having in-house lines makers not only improved the end-user product but also allowed FanDuel to fuel more innovation quickly. FanDuel was the first to introduce same-game parlays, which proved incredibly popular in the market. They engaged customers more and had higher margins because they were harder to win, making them the perfect product for a sportsbook.
This is a snippet of the transcript.Contact Salesto get full access.
Only savvy customers. Most sports bettors are not that savvy, which is why the investment in brands is so integral. Companies like FanDuel and DraftKings started with what I would call an unfair advantage due to their DFS database. They had millions of sports bettors who weren't officially sports bettors but were playing daily fantasy, with emails and information ready to go. It's like starting a race with a rocket attached to your horse.
This is a snippet of the transcript.Contact Salesto get full access.
Add in FanDuel, which had Flutter come in with substantial financial backing, allowing them to spend heavily on brand and advertising. Now, other entrants like Fanatics and ESPN are trying to compete, but FanDuel and DraftKings are so far ahead. If regulations similar to those in the UK and Australia were implemented, prohibiting acquisition offers on television, it would strengthen the duopoly of FanDuel and DraftKings. They are already far ahead in brand awareness and can continue spending on general brand marketing, making it nearly impossible for newcomers like Fanatics or Betfred to make an impact.
This is a snippet of the transcript.Contact Salesto get full access.
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2025 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.