This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
We need to clarify the definition of a gray market. On Farfetch, we have brand and boutique supplies. I wouldn't necessarily call that the gray market. We have other local players whose transactions are not transparent, like how they clear customs. That's a different level of gray market. Following your definition, regarding Farfetch and Hong Kong, we want to work with those players, but we are compliant. We need to demonstrate the merchant information to end customers, which is important because we pay the duty and declare the boutique address and names. Brands can easily identify where the goods come from and catch unauthorized boutiques. So, real gray market players won't work with Farfetch because the brand can easily identify them.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
Demand dropped very quickly. Soon, people on social media started talking about prices. The effect was immediate. In China, many people discuss prices and demand on social media. It was very noticeable, especially with top brands like Gucci and Kering brands. The word spread quickly, and demand shrank rapidly. Initially, it was somewhat manageable because people knew not to buy Gucci on Farfetch but rather OTB brands. At that time, we weren't working closely with OTB brands, so you could still buy Margiela or Marni with a decent discount. Demand was shrinking, but then it worsened because even OTB brands asked for selective distribution. All major brands demanded the same, making Farfetch non-competitive in pricing.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2025 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.
Subscribe to access hundreds of interviews and primary research