This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
The client cares about the best pricing. They want the lowest funder success fees and a quick turnaround. They care about which funders come back to them quickly, but also who will be best at creating income they take home at the end of the day. Those are the early stages but as the process goes on, the funder meets with the client to check that the client will go along with reasonable settlement offers if they arise. They check the client doesn't have a personal vendetta against the defendant which might draw out the litigation process. When a client comes to a funder without a law firm, the funder will take the claim to market to get several quotes on legal spend from law firms who they value and respect, then take that to the client, and I have been part of those processes before. The client will consider which law firms to use in a sense of cost but also expertise, in the sense of which law firm will represent them in the best way.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
The higher return is also due to the value of cases. A £20 million case no longer involves straightforward contractual litigation. An investment duty claim or construction case has a higher risk towards the end and you could lose £20 million and not reap any rewards. Previously, you were only losing £2 million to £4 million but you had another 10 cases in the pipe which could be lucrative if they win. With £20 million cases, you invest in less claims and diversify your investments in a smaller pod of more expensive cases, but they are high-risk high-reward. You could potentially win £80 million at the end of it. As a result, the market prices in a higher return on investment, and your pricing gets higher as you put more money into these cases.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2023 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.
The executive has 10 years experience in litigation funding, with 4 years at Augusta and now in business development at a law firm helping lawyers fund cases.
Subscribe to access hundreds of interviews and primary research