This is a snippet of the transcript.Contact Salesto get full access.
We didn't focus on one-man delivery because the economics were against us, and the network was more specialized towards two-man deliveries. All our volume was just two-man. In the UK, anything weighing more than 31.5 kg is considered a large parcel. If it's just one box and one man above 31.5 kg, it used to be handled by XTP. We had parameters set up so that WDN wouldn't even compete for that type of parcel. For one-man multi-box deliveries, we allowed the algorithm to choose between XTP and BJS. For two-man deliveries, 80% of the volume was handled by WDN, with the remaining 20% split between Panther and BJS. Panther handled 15% and BJS 5%. We were moving away from BJS due to its high incidence rate and deteriorating relationship. It was easier to manage with one provider, especially when giving them such low volumes. Three-man deliveries were exclusively handled by Panther.
This is a snippet of the transcript.Contact Salesto get full access.
I think there were two factors. One was that XTP had a high incidence rate. They used to cut corners around storage and fulfillment, and they were generally considered the least desirable partner from a customer experience point of view. However, when we did the math, taking the damage rate into consideration, it still came out cheaper. That's why we went with them. But the economics were evolving. Towards the end, they kept getting more expensive because there was a push to start charging Wayfair more.
This is a snippet of the transcript.Contact Salesto get full access.
Prioritizing too much of a good customer experience and increasing prices by £25 would completely price out all the SKUs that Wayfair has. So, it was about achieving the best customer experience at the cheapest price and fastest time possible. Quite a few times, if WDN took two or three extra days, we would go with a third party to maintain speed. Price was also not compromised because there was massive pressure on lowering costs and getting customers to convert. Eventually, the third pillar we compromised on was the damage rates. It's not like Wayfair completely disregarded damage rates and experience. They worked with XTP to improve processes and limit damages as much as possible. At some point, XTP stopped responding, and the situation deteriorated. When they started bumping up prices or adding accessorial charges and negotiating in bad faith, Wayfair decided it was enough. We were already doing requests for proposals for the one-man large parcel item space that XTP was working on, trying to figure out if WDN could fulfill these orders. Those conversations were happening when I was leaving.
This is a snippet of the transcript.Contact Salesto get full access.




This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2025 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.
Subscribe to access hundreds of interviews and primary research



