This is a snippet of the transcript.Contact Salesto get full access.
I think that could definitely be the goal. However, I believe there's a higher ROI in being a technology provider rather than running the business. If you look at the margins when you allocate a vehicle with minimal human resources and earn, let's say, about 50 or 40 cents a mile over, say, 100,000 miles on average—or maybe that's on the higher side—but even if a robotaxi runs about 80,000 miles a year and you earn 50 cents a mile, you're still generating about $40,000 per vehicle in revenue with minimal overhead.
This is a snippet of the transcript.Contact Salesto get full access.
Now, Uber's average revenue per mile is about $4. If you take half of that, you get about $2. So for 80,000 miles a year with an average mile cost of $4, even if Waymo gets half of it, which is $2, each vehicle generates about $160,000 in revenue. That's a significant amount and almost breaks even the BOM cost of the vehicle in a year or less. In a first-party model, there's a lot of infrastructure setup needed and human labor involved, which is difficult to model for. In dense urban environments, where robotaxis are feasible, labor is expensive.
This is a snippet of the transcript.Contact Salesto get full access.
Yes, I believe that in two years, Zoox will reach a level of maturity and stabilization similar to Waymo. Waymo has hit a saturation curve with their 1,500 vehicles operating in the five major cities in the U.S. They are not learning anything new; they are just running as a service. Zoox will likely hit that maturity curve in two years, becoming extremely safe unless someone else is at fault.
This is a snippet of the transcript.Contact Salesto get full access.
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2025 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.
Subscribe to access hundreds of interviews and primary research