This is a snippet of the transcript.Contact Salesto get full access.
Once a piece of equipment is established as the standard, it becomes the preferred choice. The founder and designer of Ligchine, Pete Ligman, used other equipment and thought there had to be a better way. He found the existing leveling approach complicated. So, Pete developed equipment that leveled differently. Both Somero and Ligchine level floors, but they use different technologies. Somero levels the head, while Ligchine levels the entire machine, making them completely different.
This is a snippet of the transcript.Contact Salesto get full access.
Somero adjusts the head independently of the boom, making it difficult to account for boom drop. Ligchine, however, calculates boom drop into the leveling process, dampening the head's movement. Watching a Somero machine, you'll notice the head constantly adjusting due to boom droop, which it can't detect. This results in the head moving up and down to maintain a level floor. Somero patented their network technology, making market entry difficult for others. Pete decided not to level the head but the entire machine, accounting for boom droop and using the machine as a dampening device. Ligchine was the first to enter the market without copying Somero's head-leveling method, which facilitated their market entry.
This is a snippet of the transcript.Contact Salesto get full access.
In Europe, a few companies are now competing with different leveling approaches, and some startups in China are producing direct Somero knockoffs. Somero will likely need to defend their technology against copycats as their patents expire. Somero is focusing on quality, while Ligchine offers short lead times and lower costs. Compared to Somero equipment, Ligchine's low-end and mid-tier equipment is significantly cheaper.
This is a snippet of the transcript.Contact Salesto get full access.
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2025 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.