This is a snippet of the transcript.Contact Salesto get full access.
Yes, one of the main issues was that the U.S. market was Somero's primary focus at the time. They claimed to be a worldwide company, but they didn't consider global requirements. This has changed over the last few years. In Europe, we needed something towable behind a pickup truck, weighing under 2.5 tons, small, easy to maneuver, and capable of rotating on site. At that time, all we had was a very affordable product from Ligchine.
This is a snippet of the transcript.Contact Salesto get full access.
When it first launched, it was around £80,000, compared to the Somero machine, which was about £150,000. I discussed with Somero about their S15R, which was available, and I said that even if we reduced the price of the S15R to match Ligchine's, customers wouldn't buy it due to higher ownership costs. The transport cost for an S15 to a site was significantly more than for a Ligchine, which could be towed by a pickup. In the UK, people were getting quotes of £800 to £1,000 each time to move the machine to a site. That could mean the difference between profit and loss on a site, so offering the machine at the same price wasn't viable.
This is a snippet of the transcript.Contact Salesto get full access.
Out of the ones I just mentioned, only one has Ligchine machines. They have two Ligchine machines. Stanford used to have a Ligchine. They bought it for a specific project they were doing at the time. I'm currently talking to one of those contractors about a Ligchine machine. They want a demonstration from us, but that's for some of the smaller jobs, not the bigger ones they're doing. So again, if Ligchine is competing with Somero against the S-22 or S-28, in my mind, there's nothing on the market that can compete with those machines.
This is a snippet of the transcript.Contact Salesto get full access.
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2025 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.
Subscribe to access hundreds of interviews and primary research