Ryanair vs. easyJet: Airport Development Strategy & Operating Model
Former Senior Manager at easyJet
inpractise.com/articles/ryanair-vs-easyjet-airport-development-strategy-and-operating-model
Ryanair vs. easyJet: Airport Development Strategy & Operating Model(April 22, 2025)
Former Senior Manager at easyJet
Interview Transcript
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
Regarding the variables you mentioned, like keeping unit costs down and aircraft ownership, how did EasyJet deviate from this over the years?
EasyJet operates in slot-constrained airports, aiming to be the number one or two player in those locations for profitable revenue. However, during downturns, this strategy offers little flexibility, as they can't easily move out without risking their territory. They're restricted in moving aircraft around, unlike Ryanair, which operates in about 30% slot-constrained airports.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
This is how they establish a dominant position. How would EasyJet establish a dominant position in a new airport? I understand that when acquiring the fleet of Go, they inherited some slots and positioning in slot-constrained airports. But let's say today, if EasyJet wanted to develop a new route and a new destination, a new airport, how would they do this if Ryanair is already there?
EasyJet doesn't tend to enter the same areas and markets as Ryanair. They focus on growing within their existing markets.
This is a snippet of the transcript, sign up to read more.
Related Content
Wizz Air: Route Strategy & Network Planning
Former Revenue & Capacity Management Executive at Wizz Air
Wizz Air: Pricing Models & Route Defensibility
Former Senior Network Development Manager at Wizz Air
Ryanair, easyJet, and Wizz Air Competition
Former Alliances Coordinator at Aegean Airlines
AENA & Airport Operators: Managing the Aircraft's Critical Path
Former Airport Operations Manager at AENA
Copyright Notice
This document may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means including resale of any part, unauthorised distribution to a third party or other electronic methods, without the prior written permission of IP 1 Ltd.
IP 1 Ltd, trading as In Practise (herein referred to as "IP") is a company registered in England and Wales and is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer, and is not licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.
In Practise reserves all copyright, intellectual and other property rights in the Content. The information published in this transcript (“Content”) is for information purposes only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Information provided by IP is to be used as an educational tool and nothing in this Content shall be construed as an offer, recommendation or solicitation regarding any financial product, service or management of investments or securities. The views of the executive expressed in the Content are those of the expert and they are not endorsed by, nor do they represent the opinion of In Practise. In Practise makes no representations and accepts no liability for the Content or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will in no way be held liable for any potential or actual violations of laws, including without limitation any securities laws, based on Information sent to you by In Practise.
© 2025 IP 1 Ltd. All rights reserved.